Places that matter and places that don't: territorial revenge and counter-revenge in Poland
The Geography of Revenge and Counter-Revenge: Poland's Political Divide
Geographic Polarization and Economic Divides
Poland has become a captivating example of how economic inequality can fuel geographic political polarization. The election of the anti-establishment and Eurosceptic PiS party in 2015 marked the beginning of a divisive era in Polish politics.
As the party entrenched itself in power, the gulf between prosperous urban centers and struggling rural areas widened. The PiS steadily gained support in peripheries, where communities felt marginalized and forgotten.
The "Revenge of Places That Don't Matter"
Sociologist Christophe Guilluy coined the term "revenge of places that do not matter" to describe how marginalized communities can harbor deep resentment towards elites. This phenomenon played out starkly in Poland, as the PiS exploited these sentiments to build an electoral stronghold.
The Counter-Revenge of Prosperous Cores
However, in the recent elections, a broad coalition of liberal, centrist, and left-wing parties unseated the PiS. This shift can be attributed to a counter-mobilization by affluent regions, which felt threatened by the PiS's policies. The "counter-revenge of places that matter" intensified the geography of political polarization in Poland.
Expert Insight
"The rise of political polarization is a global trend, but it has been particularly pronounced in Poland," said Professor Andres Rodriguez-Pose, an expert in economic geography. "The country provides a sobering reminder of how regional inequality can undermine social cohesion and democracy."